Порівняльна характеристика автомобільного та залізничного туризму
Loading...
Date
2020
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
ТОВ "ДКС Центр", Київ
Abstract
UKR: Задля ефективної роботи залізничного транспорту в умовах сучасного ринку автори пропонують розвивати в Україні залізничний туризм. Проведено порівняння залізничного та автомобільного туризму та визначено їх переваги та недоліки. Наведене порівняння вказує на високий потенціал першого за умови, якщо він буде використовувати сучасний комфортний рухомий склад. Остаточний вибір туристичних перевезень слід обгрунтовувати економічними розрахунками через тривалість життєвого циклу інвестиційного проекту. Під час формування варіантів реалізації проекту автори пропонують визначати прогнозні грошові потоки кожного сценарію та ймовірність їх реалізації. В результаті запропонованих авторами заходів очікується зростання пасажиропотоку на залізниці, підвищення іміджу українських залізниць всередині країни та за її межами, залучення додаткових коштів на оновлення застарілої інфраструктури та рухомого складу, відновлення об'єктів культурно-історичного значення, створення нових робочих місць, втримання міграційних процесів в Західній Україні.
ENG: Comparison of two types of the tourist travels performed by railway and road transport is of great interest. Each of these modes of transport has certain advantages and disadvantages. For example, railway tourism has the following advantages: 1. The main advantage of the railway transport is the association of hotel and restaurant services with the process of tourist transportations between different Ukrainian cities and tourist attractions. 2. The number of inconvenient transportations through the tourist towns and the objects for relax and active rest is significantly reduced, as the trips to the places of morning and evening meals and stay in hotels are eliminated. 3. Due to elimination of time for transfer transportations, morning and evening meals, as well as the time for the rest in hotels, tourists can in addition view local tourist attractions, beautiful nature, reserves and other peculiarities. 4. Travels by premium class buses provide only partial use of toilets, as there is no full comfort for maintenance of such toilets at the tourist routes. 5. Automobile tourism cannot provide full comfort for its customers. 6. The travel term by railway transport can far exceed the travel term by tourist buses, as the latter do not provide appropriate comfort. At the same time, automobile tourism has some significant advantages over the railway tourism, they are: 1. High mobility. 2. Only partially requires the use of transfer transportations to travel on certain automobile roads. 3. Sector of tourism services is much broader than that of railway transport, because it has a much larger network of highways. 4. Tourist buses can smoothly run the roads of the European countries, which is very difficult for railway transport as it is required the replacement of bogies for the track 1435 mm. However, both of the proposed types for tourist traffic have significant disadvantages: 1. Low speed. 2. Railway and road transport (limited) can only be used within the continents. 3. Both types of tourist traffic pollute the environment in varying degrees. Automobile transport pollute the air most of all because it uses diesel fuel, the railway transport is more environmentally friendly because basically it uses electric traction.
ENG: Comparison of two types of the tourist travels performed by railway and road transport is of great interest. Each of these modes of transport has certain advantages and disadvantages. For example, railway tourism has the following advantages: 1. The main advantage of the railway transport is the association of hotel and restaurant services with the process of tourist transportations between different Ukrainian cities and tourist attractions. 2. The number of inconvenient transportations through the tourist towns and the objects for relax and active rest is significantly reduced, as the trips to the places of morning and evening meals and stay in hotels are eliminated. 3. Due to elimination of time for transfer transportations, morning and evening meals, as well as the time for the rest in hotels, tourists can in addition view local tourist attractions, beautiful nature, reserves and other peculiarities. 4. Travels by premium class buses provide only partial use of toilets, as there is no full comfort for maintenance of such toilets at the tourist routes. 5. Automobile tourism cannot provide full comfort for its customers. 6. The travel term by railway transport can far exceed the travel term by tourist buses, as the latter do not provide appropriate comfort. At the same time, automobile tourism has some significant advantages over the railway tourism, they are: 1. High mobility. 2. Only partially requires the use of transfer transportations to travel on certain automobile roads. 3. Sector of tourism services is much broader than that of railway transport, because it has a much larger network of highways. 4. Tourist buses can smoothly run the roads of the European countries, which is very difficult for railway transport as it is required the replacement of bogies for the track 1435 mm. However, both of the proposed types for tourist traffic have significant disadvantages: 1. Low speed. 2. Railway and road transport (limited) can only be used within the continents. 3. Both types of tourist traffic pollute the environment in varying degrees. Automobile transport pollute the air most of all because it uses diesel fuel, the railway transport is more environmentally friendly because basically it uses electric traction.
Description
Л. Марценюк: ORCID 0000-0003-4121-8826, О. Павлусенко: ORCID: 0000-0002-7043-1514
Keywords
залізничний туризм, автомобільний туризм, транспортна подорож, АТ "Укрзалізниця", форми туризму, railway tourism, car tourism, transport travel, JSC "Ukrzaliznytsya", forms of tourism, КЕМ
Citation
Марценюк Л. В., Павлусенко О. В. Порівняльна характеристика автомобільного та залізничного туризму. Економіка та держава. 2020. № 4. С. 60–67. DOI: 10.32702/2306-6806.2020.4.60.